Protecting Future Florida: Doris Leeper

Originally Published on August 20, 2014

Four hundred and thirty-six years before Doris Leeper departed this planet, the French artist Charles Jacques Le Moyne captured the images of the Timucua Indians, like those living along Spruce Creek.

Shortly after her death, Volusia County and other investors dedicated roughly 2500 acres of land to her legacy as a nature preserve to prevent habitat destruction for future generations to experience and called it Doris Leeper Spruce Creek Preserve. Similarly, Le Moyne captured the moments in history before the destruction of the Timucua society so that today we can experience what life was like in Florida when Europeans first arrived and had existed for thousands of years.

TimucuaTownship

This is how the Indians construct their towns: they choose a place near a swift stream and level it as much as possible. Next they make a circular ditch and fix in the ground, very close together, thick round palings the height of two men. At the town’s entrance they make the opening of the circle narrower, in the form of a spiral so that this entrance does not admit more than two men abreast at a time. The course of the stream is diverted to this point. At the beginning and end of this passage a round edifice is erected, full of holes and slits which, considering their means, are constructed very elegantly. In each, sentinels who are expert at smelling the enemy from afar are stationed. As soon as they detect the scent of the enemy, they rush out, shrieking, to find him. At this alarm the inhabitants of the town run out to defend their fortress, armed with bows and arrows and clubs. The king’s dwelling is in the middle, and has been a little sunk into the ground to avoid the sun’s heat. All around it are grouped the nobles’ houses, lightly constructed and roofed with palm branches.

The quote above is from Theodore de Bry’s 1591 plates he used to publish his Grand Voyages book with Le Moyne’s artwork to illustrate the discovery of the New World. Although preserving Timucua life back then was the last of their lifestyle during the French and Spanish invasions, Doris Leeper has provided future generations the opportunity to experience the Old Florida Pioneer environment, or New World, as it was at that time: pristine and natural.

Doris Leeper Spruce Creek Preserve Map-lores

The aerial map above shows the outline of the Spruce Creek preserve. From the west, Cracker Creek visitors can rent kayaks, canoes, or hydrobikes to paddle into the preserve on water. In addition, Cracker Creek visitors can reserve a pontoon boat to take a two-hour tour of the preserve all the way up to US Highway 1. Alternatively, on foot, horse, or bike, visitors can use this map for directions to the preserve entrance and this map to find your way to the shorelines. For more information about the preserve, please click here to view Friends of Spruce Creek’s website.

Per the Doris Leeper Spruce Creek Preserve Stakeholder Meeting 1 October 2012 notes: “The Preserve is a 2,477 acre property bordered by Spruce Creek and Rose Bay to the north, I-95 on the west, and the Intercoastal Waterway on the east. The Preserve is a mosaic of lands owned by several public agencies including the State of Florida, the St. Johns River Water Management District, the County of Volusia, and the City of Port Orange.

The entire Preserve is managed by Volusia County. What is very special about this land, besides preventing habitat destruction with new development, is that it contains a historical Timucua Indian middens or shell mounds. These mounds consist of thousands of oyster, clam, and snail shells that were the waste product from chowders and other seafood consumption.

These mounds also functioned as part of the hierarchy in the community with the chief positioned highest on the mound. In addition, there are smaller mounds scattered around the larger mounds indicating families populating the areas around the chief. Inside the mounds, archeologists have uncovered thousands of years of pottery, bones, toys, tools, cooking utensils, in addition to the majority of the mound constructed with millions of oyster shells. In some mounds, they actually discovered mummified corpses and heirlooms.

TimucuaCamp

In their gated community, as illustrated by Charles Jacques Le Moyne, they lived in oval and circular dwellings with conical palm-thatched roof, similar to the image above, with vines woven together and covered with clay to create walls. Because they established residence along the shorelines, they consumed a lot of local fish, shellfish, snails, oysters, clams, and mussels.

TimucuaCookingThey were hunters with bows and arrows, and gathered in the local forests, marshes, and rivers to keep some personalized animal and pottery possessions as heirlooms to pass on to their children. They planted and harvested beans, prehistoric corn (known as maize, before hybridizing), yucca, coontie roots, and squash. Cooking would be group events where the shell mounds would provide the venue for celebrating historic events and hosting feasts for the residents.

The Timucua art was displayed in various forms such as tattoos, clothing, sculpture, and pottery. They spent hours creating elaborate tattoos, as illustrated below, covering large parts of their bodies. Then by using shells, bones, Spanish moss, dried animal organs, and pottery pieces, the Timucua adorned animal hides worn as loincloths for both men and women, but the women accessorized with sashes, shawls, and hairpieces.

Timucua Jewelry-rsbi1_lemoyne_chief_andwomen_1

Hair was uncut for both men and women. Women’s hair was loose while men tied their hair up top, as illustrated in the picture below. They wore different outfits for a variety of occasions such as tribal ceremonies, family gatherings, religious events, dances, and festivals.

Timucua Totem PoleTimucuan_Warrior_TattoosWordPress forced image

In 1955, a dredging crew discovered the above totem buried in muck on Hontoon Island in the St. Johns River near the mounds also located on the island. It currently resides in the Fort Carolina National Museum near Jacksonville. “It is the largest pre-Columbian wood carving found in Florida and is the only totem of its kind in eastern United States.” – Wikipedia.

giphy

Central Florida Indian Timeline

After the Pangaea moved the continents apart, the ice age began and the waters receded to expose more land around all of the continents. For thousands of years this gave humans and animals a bridge across some continents that would later be divided by deep oceans.

This remained the same for thousands of years. It was quiet in terms of major evolutionary changes. Mankind eeked out survival in colder weather than today. Then when the waters rose, the peninsula of Florida became what it is today. The map to the left shows the ice age outline of the peninsula expanding deep into the Gulf of Mexico.

Florida remained isolated and uninhabited on a permanent basis by humans for thousands of years. Visitors included the migratory tribes that roamed in and out during the different seasons.

Then 7000 years ago, humans became more sedentary and setup permanent residence along the rivers, migrating south from the northern continent. Today, evidence shows Timucua Indians settled in what is now Flagler County.

Over the decades, the families expanded further south into Volusia County, from Tomoka Island to south of New Smyrna Beach. This was the age of industrial growth and agriculture.

Over the next 5000 years, Timucua Indians would inhabit and build their style of architectural mounds and sharing building methods, at the same time pyramids and Aztec temples were being built in other parts of the world.

By settling in one area, unlike other nomadic Indians, the Timucua created their own agricultural processes such as crop rotation, granaries to protect produce from weather and insects, control burn to open farmland, and hoed to plant seeds to raise for food.

As they increased in population, families would congregate to create a new village nearby that would form clusters of gated communities.

For protection, the village included a council house that the first Europeans claimed could hold up to 3000 people.

Shell Mounds in Volusia County

Shell mounds, also known as middens, have been found all over Florida and South Georgia. Of these, 11 have been discovered in Volusia and range from as far north as Tomoka State Park down to South New Smyrna Beach Castle Windy and as far west as the Tick Island mound.

VolusiaMiddenMap
Castle Windy

Green Mound

Lake Ashby Midden

Nocoroco Mound

Old Fort Mound

Ormond Mound

Spruce Creek Mound

Thursby Mound

Tick Island Mound

Turtle Mound

 Barbarous Spaniard Massacres

Whether the explorers lost their minds in a foreign land and distant place or their bigoted and greedy leadership created beasts, the Spanish unmercifully killed 111 French settlers who first landed in Jacksonville and created Fort Caroline. This killing spree continued for hundreds of years throughout North and South America. Below is an excerpt from the French Captain, Nicolas de Challeux, of Fort Caroline, who barely escaped.

The wicket gate open, the Spanish force, having traversed forests, swamps, and rivers, arrived at break of day, Friday, the 20th September [1565], the weather very stormy, and entered the fort without any resistance, and made a horrible satisfaction of the rage and hate they had conceived against our nation. It was then who should best kill the most men, sick and well, woman and little children, in such a manner that it is impossible to conceive of a massacre which could equal this for its barbarity and cruelty.

This killing spree continued down the coast to St. Augustine that same year where the Spanish massacred or enslaved 134 French settlers and militia personnel.

Extinction of a Tribal Race: Timucua Indians

Although the Spruce Creek Timucua were not involved with the Jacksonville Fort Caroline and Saint Augustine massacres in 1565, the European plagues and disease wiped out a large majority of their populations and the rest killed by enslavement or warfare.

By 1595, their population was estimated to have been reduced from 200,000 to 50,000 and thirteen chiefdoms remained. By 1700, the population of the tribe had been reduced to 1000. Warfare against them by the English colonists and native allies completed their extinction as a tribe soon after the turn of the 19th century. They became extinct as a people. – Wikipedia.

A Legacy of Preservation

Canaveral Seashore Park map - croppedThis, of course, includes all of the ecological and natural beauty of the undeveloped original virgin Florida landscapes aggregated by local cities and county resources to preserve this land.

Prior to Spruce Creek, Doris Leeper spent years working to preserve the Canaveral National Seashore parks from south New Smyrna Beach down to Playa Linda Beach, in Titusville.

In the map to the left, the darker green areas comprise the Canaveral National Seashore and its inclusion of the separate mainland peninsula. While residential developers were trying to figure out how to consume environmentally sensitive land, Doris Leeper was figuring out ways to prevent habitat destruction and preserve the native lands for future generations.

We will forever be grateful Doris was tenacious enough to save these resources for future generations.

Preserving Unique Inhabitants

Spruce Creek Conch Shell-sm-right

Spruce creek Conch Shell        Melongena Sprucecreekensis

Spruce Creek is home to a wide variety of endangered species and special wildlife breeding and rearing ecosystems. The shell image left is a unique resident in that it is found nowhere else on the planet.

It is a subspecies of the King Crown Conch snail and inhabits the mouth of Spruce Creek, in the saltwater bays. In 1994, John K. Tucker named the Melongena Sprucecreekensis in recognition of its unique location. These conch can open and eat live oysters and clams. The largest it grows to almost 7-1/2“ with a width of a little over four inches.

A Legacy of Art

In addition to her preservation efforts, Doris Leeper was a prolific artist and advocate for helping students of the arts. She started the Atlantic Center for the Arts adjacent to the Spruce Creek Preserve to help elevate students into the professional world. Some samples of Doris’s work appear below.

New Smyrna Beach ArtDorisMetalWoodDorisChromeQuilt

With much chagrin this author offers the following links knowing they most likely will change and be defunct, especially with US Government unpredictable technology management and naming conventions not followed. My objective is to share the information and provide attribution to those who also contributed to history, in some form or another. Please add a comment if you have any corrections or questions.

Bibliography/Further Reading

All explorer transcriptions and engravings are from Discovering the New World, Based on the Works of Theodore de Bry, edited by Michael Alexander (New York: Harper & Row, 1976).

Canaveral National Seashore map courtesy of the National Park Service website: http://www.nps.gov/cana/index.htm

Doris Leeper Spruce Creek Preserve map courtesy of Department of Environmental Protection website: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/lands/ARC/Agendas/2011/Oct/ITEM_8Doris Leeper Spruce Creek Preserve.pdf

History of the Byway, Scenic & Historic A1A Coastal Byway, http://www.scenica1a.org/history.html

Pangaea Map animated GIF: http://geomaps.wr.usgs.gov/parks/animate/

Timucua wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timucua

LGM Florida coast map: http://oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/explorations/11newworld/background/intro/media/lgmflacoast.html.

Shellmounds: http://www.volusia.org/residents/history/volusia-stories/people-of-the-shellmounds/volusia-countys-prehistoric-sites/

The Spaniards in Florida: Comprising the Notable Settlement of the Hugenots, http://books.google.com/books?id=4_wpAAAAYAAJ&lpg=PA7&ots=6nyVNCY6cJ&dq=1565%20bloody%20massacre&pg=PA24#v=onepage&q=1565%20bloody%20massacre&f=false

Spanish massacre French Hugenots: http://www.nps.gov/foma/historyculture/the_massacre.htm

Spruce Creek Shellmound: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spruce_Creek_Mound_Complex

Fort Walton Beach Indian Mound Museum – pottery and jewelry images captured at this location.

Friends of Spruce Creek Preserve, http://www.friendsofsprucecreekpreserve.com/

Recent Posts

Goddard Surveillance Rover Prototype 1 Development 2018-19

This blog is about my technological venture into hardware configuration that I hope will result in a working prototype. This is a hobby to experiment for what a final product could possibly be based on this design. The first concept piece I created can be seen at the following link: Rover Initial Concept Prototype Draft.

Many of the tests turned out to be unnecessary because there was a faster, already implemented solution that only required code to implement. An example of this is the fan-cooling temperature gauge and circuit board. Once I learned RPi reports this with a query, I could turn on the DC power to those fans, at any value up to 255 to start cooling the CPU. Below is the beginning of my journal that started in July after two months of learning curve experiments.

Pan/Tilt Initial Build Results

After soldering the Adafruit 16 Channel PWM/Servo Motors HAT 40 GPIO pins and 8 of the 16 channel three pin connectors (for a total of 64 pins on one board), the pan/tilt worked marginally and inconsistently. Below is a picture of the first successful test.

Rover-P1P1-0.jpg

Thermometer and Cooling Fan Results

To be configured for outdoor use, a fan is an important addition that will at least move cooler air across the circuits once the temperature reaches 150 degrees Fahrenheit inside the unit. To create the circuitry for this feature, I consulted DigiKey who offers an online recipe and schematic editor for creating a thermometer and cooling fan. Below is the schematic I followed to create this feature.

fancontroller_bb

This is the schematic I edited for my final design:

DigiKey-schematic-fan
temp-cntrl-circuit
ThermFanPCB.png

 

Once I created the breadboard version and it worked, by removing the resistor to the transistor, I created a soldered board that ended up like the picture left.

Fried RPi 3B+ and 16 Channel PWM/Servo HAT

Following the Adafruit 16 Channel PWM/Servo HAT and DRV8871 DC Servo Motor Driver Board installation instructions, I ended up shorting out one of the driver boards that scorched the breadboard, as illustrations follow.

servo-board-e1532100445219.jpg
burnt-DRV8871

Over time, it appears the 16 Channel HAT shorted out the RPi 3B+ board because it eventually stopped booting and only one LED light lit up and nothing else. These failures caused a redesign and delay for shipping and receiving new parts.

Rover-dev-unit-July2018.png

I continued to use these dead RPi and Adafruit boards so I could build rig pieces without stressing the prototype PCBs (Printed Circuit Board). This is where we waited for the RPi3B, RasPiRobot, and PWM boards to arrive on 20 July 2018, which they did, and Phase 1 restarted.

Built Devastator Tank Wheel Base

On 18 July, while waiting for replacement parts, I decided to build the tank wheel base as shown in pictures below. To view the build instructions Click Here.

Rover-top-July2018.png

Below are the wheels with spring shock absorbers mounts.

Rover-side-July2018.png

Below is the rear end where the components will be installed as modules.

Rover-rear-July2018.png

Rover Redesign Phase 1 – Version #2

Because I fried a few boards, it became apparent an alternative configuration and boards were needed. Adafruit failed to deliver operable boards and refunded my investment in their products.

Below is a picture of the tested redesign configuration of the DC and PWM servo motors driver boards with Raspberry Pi 3B (not plus).

Note: this is the same SunFounder board was used after the level separators blew the Geekworm PWM/DC Motor board later. Also note that the breadboard contains the 360 PWM calibration circuits that are not connected in this picture to the motor.

Redesigned-Phase-1.png

23 July – The above configuration failed due to excess power noise caused by the RasPiRobot board that caused video disturbance and ejected the USB drive when attempting to use the PWM channels that resulted in the following message.

USB-drive-error

After removing the RasPiRobot board, PWM started working consistently for all servo motors, even one marked NFG worked that had failed using the original Adafruit 16 Channel PWM/Servo board.

This same day, I was able to build the new rig, as pictured below.

4A5A4A68-54B3-4418-ABCA-DFDF1B7BBADD

Then after installing and testing the Geekworm PWM/DC Motor board, the boards sagged (not shown in the picture above) because the lack of support on the top UPS board using only 10 pins for support and without the spacers, one can imagine how the boards will sag when the rover bounces on uneven surfaces.

Then I installed leveling separators between the boards and the Geekworm PWM/DC Motor board began to fail. Here is my report to the manufacturer who had no solution other than work around with a replacement board.

Rig-Base-Boards

That’s when I decided to modify the M-F jumper wires by bending the Female connector to a 90 degree right angle. To intercept the GPIO pins, because the MoPower UPS does not have GPIO extension pins like the Geekworm HAT (and other similar HATs), these same right angle connectors are installed below the HAT, as shown in the picture below, following the intro paragraph.

Rover Redesign Phase 1 – Version #3

This design is essentially the same Geekworm PWM/DC Motor HAT, however replaced, but now has the 90 degree connectors to reduce the wasted space above the HAT (shown in the picture below).

RoverPi-90deg-pins

This new design was made to confirm RPi 3B and 3B+ compatibility and to test the Geekworm HAT without metal separators. I finally found a nylon separator kit, although I only need a few pieces and will have a huge batch left over. These kinds of overages can be used on a second prototype build.

Today, 10 August 2018, we await the arrival of the RPi 3B+ board and Geekworm HAT. During this time, I created a duplicate base plate (plywood sheet) and installed the metal separators using the dead RPi and Adafruit HAT. Once the RPi 3B+ board and Geekworm HAT arrived, I installed the two boards ready to begin testing the new boards.

Remote Control Tablet

As mentioned above regarding the orders placed on 10 August, the Remote Control consists of a RPi 2 designed tablet with touchscreen and battery charging. Below is a link to their tutorial I followed.

Adafruit RPi 2 7″ Touchscreen Tablet Tutorial

These are the Remote Control parts (Flex Cable and SPDT Slide Switch excluded):

Raspberry Pi 2
7″ Touchscreen
Lithium Ion Polymer Battery
PowerBoost 1000 Charger
RPi Touchscreen Case (See Below)
Wi-Fi Dongle

RPi Touchscreen Case

For the remote control, I finally found that Adafruit tutorial with the recipe of parts needed to make it battery operated. What was unique about this project was the use of a 3D printed case. All I had to do was download the STL files from Adafruit’s website, upload them to the 3DHub.com site, and pay for shipping (total less than $30). Below is the original image of the printed parts (I chose red for fun!).

Remote-Control-Case

This turned out to be another variation on hardware integration where finding the right screws makes a whole lot of difference. The variances also require testing a screw to confirm it’s the right head shape: Flat or Round. Because the boards are stacked on the printed tray insert, a Round head can extend up into the back of a stacked board and short out the circuitry. They don’t mention this in the Adafruit tutorial.

So, what I finished the prototype design with regarding screws, I’ve listed below.

TutorialActual
M3 x .5 x 6MM3 x .5 x 6M
#2-56 3/8″#4-40 1/4″

The problem with the first Metric screws (M3) was that Skycraft carried many varieties of this screw and the first I found had a washer fixed beneath the head that caused the head to rise even higher under the stacked boards. Upon further investigation, I found the same size without the washer and ended up with a more tight fit without possible shorting.

Once I got everything working, I learned I had soldered two wires wrong off the Power Boost Charger 1000. I made this mistake because I didn’t see the – and + signs behind a USB connector that was just setting in sockets and not soldered to the board. The green arrow in the illustration below is what I missed and fried the $20 board by soldering it to the 5V and GND pins next to where the switch is soldered. I took this expense on because I failed to confirm my solder points before I commit, like “measure twice before cutting.”

remote-control_circuit-diagram-arrow

After I removed the extra piece and saw the electrical schematics, I re-soldering it in the right place, the battery never charged. So, I’m heading back to Adafruit to ask if I’ve burned another board and maybe a battery. Turns out I had fried the LiPO battery charger on the board, so I ordered a replacement. This was when support failed and could not offer an explanation why the battery was not charging. They refunded both of my last purchases and banned me from their site, indefinitely.

Rover Redesign Phase 2 – Version #4

This version change was forced by the RPi3B+ failure and the integration of the RPi3B, Geekworm HAT, and MoPower UPS. During this phase, I redesigned the 90 degree female pin connectors so that there was no black shield included with the contacts and only heat shrink shielded the contacts so less room was consumed by the black shields. This also reduced the labor and glue to hold the black shield, plus the installation was significantly easier.

Also during this phase, I migrated the 360 pan gimbal calibration circuitry to the soldered board along with the temperature switch for the fans. After deciding to migrate the fans from 5VDC to 12VDC, I migrated the fan power to the Geekworm HAT and removed the temperature switch. That way, once the thermometer read above the threshold, the code simply turns the fans on full blast. That’s when we learned one of the 12VDC fans had shorted out and no longer worked (nor could be repaired due to contact location beneath plastic shield).

While testing the PWM for the 360 calibration circuitry, I learned that my solder job had failed and decided it was time to delay the development of the 360 pan feature. Instead, for the prototype, once the 180 pan hits its left or right max radius, the code will instruct the wheels to turn opposite directions to continue the camera pan. This does not remove the requirement for the gimbal 360 pan because the camera should be able to provide 360 views for location and damage mitigation. Below are pictures of the rig with semi-operational features before implementing version #5.

After migrating to the 12VDC fans and delaying the 360 pan feature, sufficient pins and circuit board became irrelevant and were outside the MoPower UPS 10 GPIO pins requirement. This meant a GPIO 40 pin extension header could be removed and rewired to the Geekworm HAT extension header only (which is why their design failure requires any spacers for this development design).

Rover Redesign Phase 2 – Version #5

After removing the circuit board for 360 gimbal and cooling fans along with their wires, the content of the rover changed considerably, as shown in the pictures below.

Rover-version5-cavity

During this phase of version #5, I wrote code to use the keyboard to drive the wheels and turn forward and reverse. What’s nice about these motors is when something is going in the wrong direction, like forward and reverse, it’s a simple reverse polarity on the power to fix the direction problem. I had to do that to the power supply wires to the motor connected to the HAT. Once I did that, my code turned the correct wheels (left versus right) and forward/reverse worked successfully. Next to version #6, batteries and secured rig to chassis.

Rover Redesign Phase 2 – Version #6

After creating the rig lock mechanism with Velcro, acrylic side slides, and front key-lock latch, I tried the battery driven vehicle but encountered a failure with the Geekworm HAT. Although it appeared like the previous board I fried, this time it recovered and operated accurately with shore power. I have sent a question to the manufacturer asking how to connect a battery to their board; it may need some kind of regulator. After searching the web for an answer, determined a UBEC needed to be added to regulate the power and it worked. Below is a picture of version 6.

rover-version6-waiting-parts

Pan and Tilt Gimbal

Because of the 360 degree pan feature delay, I decided to search again for a python gimbal and found a 3D printer opportunity for a less-flimsy Adafruit gimbal. Below is their glamour shot picture of the parts that are max 4″x4″ and encloses the wiring.

3DHubs-360-gimbal

I have sent email to a local 3D printer engineer asking if he can help with plastic residue refinement and tests, as well as contacting the designer of this gimbal via email to ask some specific questions. One question is where to find a switch that is listed in the parts list that I cannot find and how does the camera ribbon cable enter the mounting head’s electronics.

Rover Redesign Phase 4 – Version #7

This section skips a phase because of the many redesigns overlapping each other. This phase is an operational battery-powered prototype with full 360 degree pan and 180 degree tilt gimbal. This required building a wooden rim to hold the gimbal under the glass dome. The full rig design can be seen here. The camera dome design is illustrated below.

Hardware-Rig-Dome-Plate

Based upon my design RFC (request for change), Ben Holler sent back the gimbal base that 1) fit under the dome (this I learned was serendipitous because I was removing unnecessary legs which would be more for a DSLR camera than the rover) and 2) rotated the screw holes to accommodate the camera ribbon cable. The ribbon cable issue is still under research once the rig dome has been built.

Rover-version7-minus-gimbal
rover-gimbal-dome-v7.png

Here’s the current operational version of the rover, without and with the gimbal.

Dome Base Plate – Rig 3D Print Part – Version #8

Because the wood used for the Dome Base Plate cracked the dome due to difficult curves through hard grain, it made more sense to 3D print the part so that the dimensions and fittings are more precise. To do this, I used AutoDesk 123D Design app and built the dome structure plate with the original gimbal base plate.

  • Original Full Diameter and Depth: 166mm x 20mm, Radius: 83
  • Changed Full Diameter and Depth: 177mm x 20mm, Radius: 88.5
  • Dome radius channel to external base top: 70.5 x 15mm (used 71mm radius)
  • Camera base extrusion channel to dome radius and depth: 67.5mm x 15mm (used 67mm width)
  • Inner full opening: 22.5mm x 25mm (20mm exceeded to cutout hole)
  • Bolt holes 5mm and ribbon cable opening 18mm x 2mm

Here’s how it looked close to ready for print:

rover-dome-base-plate.png

Next 3D Print Job September 2018

This section is to list the parts that need to be printed again and why.

  1. Rover Dome Base Plate – Picture above was correct but not submitted for print because of errors with the edits. What was printed the center axis of the base is rotated incorrectly as well as the mounting bolt holes in the front and back are way too big.
  2. Rover Acrylic Motor Driver Board – The holes for the micro PCBs are too close to each other and cause the bolts to jut out at angles. Needed to lengthen the main board and separate the left board’s right side from the right board’s left side.
  3. Tablet RPi Holder – This is a design change from the original printed part that separates the RPi mount from the main mount that holds the display board and battery (see picture below).
  4. Tablet Main Mount – This is a design change from the original printed part that remains after separating the RPi Holder.
  5. Rover Gear 14 – Needed to reduce the motor axis shaft opening that allows slippage. Also needed to sand gear burrs on smaller flat side to prevent contacting other parts when moving.
  6. Rover Gear 9 – Needed to edit the gear by flipping the treads or internal slot and to reduce the motor axis shaft opening that allows slippage.

——-

Gimbal Gears Analysis

After spending all day 21 September building the motor driver board test system and rebuilding the gimbal, testing it all and worked closer to expectation than before. Tested it again, this morning, to try calibrating the head to exact coordinates but it eventually failed and locked up, again. After examining the motor-free housing case, the problem appears to be caused by stepper motor gears problem, listed below.

  1. Gear 9 – The gear extends too far over Gear 15 and thus out-of-alignment. Needed to edit the gear to tighten gear shaft opening, like Gear 14. Determined Nylon was best for this and Gear 14 due to heat from motor per Kyle’s recommendation. He said they were better for the heat and being more pliable.
  2. Gear 15 Opening – Needed to be sanded to allow free-spin where it was jamming slightly when spinning. Could be both the gear and the opening.
  3. Gear 14 – Needed sanding of burrs along the short diameter side to prevent catching opening when moving. Also needed tighter gear shaft opening, like Gear 9. Determined Nylon was best for this Gear.

Tablet Redesign – Revision #1

Because Adafruit was unable to support their products, I researched online for other UPS boards that would accomplish the same battery operations without their products. This created the opportunity to improve the original design and upgrade the motherboard to RPi model 3B which includes integrated Wi-Fi support that RPi 2 does not. The RPi 3B version will be the main upgrade for the Tablet Redesign Revision #2.

Below is the list of Revision #1 changes:

  1. Lower the motherboard mount beneath the main mount structure. This helps provide more space for the new battery HAT to be installed on the top of the RPi. Add same screw holes to motherboard mount and add two new screw holes to attach the RPi mounting structure to the main mount.
  2. Remove the PowerBoost mount from the main mounting board.
  3. Add two screw holes to the middle of the case back and lid.
  4. Close case side opening near PowerBoost mount, case over Ethernet connector, and remove switch.
  5. Add bottom case opening to access the new battery board power switch.
  6. Use #4-40×1/4″ screws for the main mount structure and back lid.

Pictures of remote control tablet:

Remote-mounts.png
7″ Touchscreen Display and Driver Board with Component Mounting Bracket
Remote Control User Interface with picture insert of future video feature

First Outdoor Field Test

Version 8 – Integrated System Complete

Rover-Prototype-Top-v8

23 October 2018 is the date I finally integrated a majority of the parts that all successfully operate. Because the rover needs to be tested in a rough environment, I am holding off testing the larger camera. As a result of the Gimbal pan cable being too short to reach the bottom of the stacked boards, will have to move the DC Stepper Board to the top of the stack, directly beneath the Gimbal base. Currently, the Gimbal cannot go beyond 90 degrees right or it will rip the cable. Also, determined M5 bolts are too large to fit inside the 5mm hole in the Gimbal base (see missing in picture) and replaced that bolt with a M4 bolt.

Rover-Prototype-Right-v8

Picture Above is Right Side of Rig

Rover-Prototype-Left-v8

Picture Above is Left Side of Rig

Version 9 – Integrated System Redesign Complete

The redesign consisted of the following changes that were described in the journal section at the top of this blog. Recap, all worked with the exception of the streaming camera video boot and gimbal with python3, works with python2. Also, remote control tablet is functional with kivy UI. Full System backup of both devices today 12 November 2018.

  1. Replaced wheels and fans connectors with JST 2.0 mini connectors.
  2. Flipped and moved the gimbal stepper motor board to the top of the stack closest to camera. This was to solve the camera pan right that was stretching the cable too far.
  3. Heatshrinked fans and wheels cables.

Version 10 – Integrated System Redesign Initiated

This R/RC redesign consisted of new tablet case (see below), additional board to remove the flipped ribbon cable to run flatly between boards, and upgrading the RPi from 3B to 3A+, thus removing the RJ45 connector and four USB slots. This version also includes three buttons on the base of the video window that allows the user to take a snapshot of the video image and the tablet screen (see RC image below) as well as recording video for a max of one minute, user controlled button.

New Remote Control Case – Version #2

Below are shots of the new tablet case that has been submitted to 3DHubs.com and FluxDesign, the latter redirected my order to a different provider, Walter’s World, on 16 December.

Remote Control User Interface Enhancement

Below is the tablet’s screen capture and still video capture generated pictures. The three new buttons under the video will be enhanced to look like the other buttons on the right, in the picture below.

ScrSnap12-15-18_13-59-17
VidSnap12-15-18_13-59-11

Then after enhancing the User Interface with icons, the screen appears as illustrated below:

ScrSnap12-19-18_20-40-55

In this screen capture taken with the bottom right Shot button under the video, it displays the new icons on the top left and the three new capture buttons on the bottom center beneath the video display. There are two battery icons on the top left, R = Rover and RC = Remote Control that shows the rough amount left in battery capacity. The Rover battery icon is showing the alert battery icon indicating less than 20% capacity. The Remote Control battery icon is showing less than 80% remaining battery capacity. Note that for the Remote Control, this is only a rough indicator where you can see the actual amount above the Wheel Motors control to turn left. In this capture, the battery is actually 50% and should the go lower, the battery capacity icon will change to 50%.

The Wi-Fi indicator is also a rough indicator based upon the signal strength provided by the RPi and OS. The next icon to the right is the Rover communications indicator showing a green background when connected successfully or red background when there is no connection.

Then below the video display window, the three buttons are the Record the video stream for up to a minute on the Rover, but the user can stop the recording before that minute has recorded to Stop the recording. The middle button captures the video window, today, and plans are to enhance that to shoot the full resolution still video shot using picam and saved on the Rover.

Version 10 Rig Rebuild

Took the following photos when rebuilding the rig PCB configuration with the following changes:

  1. Replace RPi3B with RPi3A+ – not visible in picture below.
  2. Add new ribbon cable board to prevent curling cables sideways – see ribbon cable on center of left picture below.
  3. Lengthen the 12V power cable so connector accessible from outside – see connector on left side of rig (next to ribbon cable), in left picture.

The Reconfiguration Bay is an old pool water hose vacuum with the wheels removed so it stands flat to flip the rig over for easy access to the electronic components. The boards in order from the top to the bottom in the left picture are:

  1. NEW NOT SHOWN (this is a before shot of the rig) Camera Ribbon Cable Board
  2. UPS and Battery Board (shown as top in this picture)
  3. SB Component DC Motor Board for Fans and Wheels
  4. Raspberry Pi 3A+
  5. KOOKYE Stepper Motor Driver Board – for Gimbal
  6. Home Built Fans/Wheels Power Connectors Board

Lengthening the 12V Power Input Cable to be accessible from the rear allows easier connection with the Battery Cable shown in the bottom left of the picture below. This picture also show the Fans and Wheels 4-pin connectors.

RoverRear-Power2019.png

——-

Remote Control Internal Components – Version 10

While restoring the operating system and apps on the tablet that stopped communicating due to my attempts to connect it to the hotspot, I was able to take a few photos of the inside of the Remote Control and post them below. I also removed a portion of the RPi mounting plate so that the microSD card is accessible without disassembly. There are several minor modifications to the 3D print file that need to be made to loosen up and relocate some of the screw holes so the back panels fit more accurately. This can be seen in the first picture of the back panels and how they are slightly askew.

Remote_External
Remote_Internals_3
remote_internals_1.jpg
remote_internals_2.jpg

Migrating Wi-Fi LAN to R/RC Subnet

This section gives an overview of the hardware, research, and tests that were necessary to migrate to a R/RC Wi-Fi Access Point (AP) subnet. First, the hardware needed a wired Ethernet connection so that when I switched from the Goddard Wi-Fi Network to the Remote Control AP, I could still operate on the RPi through ssh (PuTTY) terminal, since the home Wi-Fi AP would no longer appear on the R/RC network. So for testing, I used two RPi 3B units, two RJ45 Ethernet cables, the HDMI monitor that normally runs the SlideShow all day, and the HDMI TV.

Once I got the dev units to startup with the Ethernet cables, I then went through online pages to figure out how to setup the Remote Control with hostapd on Arch Linux ARM. As mentioned in my journal, This research took many trials and reverting back to previous versions of OS builds on chips. Today is the first day to test the configuration that has worked when the Goddard Wi-Fi Network access point (Apple Wi-Fi router) rebooted and the R/RC continued to ping each other during the boot process.

At this point is where I needed to start switching networks using software instead of CLI (terminal) commands, I used the two dev units to simulate the switching before attempting to migrate to the operational Rover, in the first operational tests. Because the ping worked, I’m hopeful the Rover will be able to switch between the two networks. That’s why I created the network_switch.py service app to test on the dev Rover.

Rover GPS Time Sync Function

Because the Raspberry Pi does not include a realtime hardware clock and the Rover needs to boot in the field without Wi-Fi or any Internet connections, I had to integrate a GPS (Global Position System) to obtain the UTC time from satellites. I learned this from my initial field tests where the apps sat waiting for the system time to be set but there was no Internet access to obtain the NTP (Network Time Protocol) to sync the computer date and time. Although this took many hours testing different configurations, suggested solutions on other linux distributions, outdated information and a couple chatrooms, I was able to hack together an Arch Linux solution that follows integration standards.

Months before this need, I had ordered a GPS Module with TTL Ceramic Passive Antenna (shown above) knowing I would need it one day for R&D. Because I had kept copious notes on the Rover GPIO pins, I had four pins in a row reserved for power, ground, transmit, and receive signals from the satellites. Using a spare RPi 3B, I was able to cable and connect to the GPS with up to 7 satellites fixing inside our home. The next few weeks were spent configuring and testing until it was ready to install in the Rover. This required a wiring harness so that the unit was detachable and could be removed when working on the rig.

Rover Right Side Motor Rig
Rover Left Side Motor Rig

One important thing I learned in this research process is that PPS is not needed for the NTP timesync and GPS connection. Older online documentation suggests using that for the time pulse to the GPS that is no longer necessary with the later releases of gpsd, ntp, and systemd-timesyncd.

References – Tools and Workshop

Here’s our workshop for making wood and acrylic parts:

workshop.jpg
Rover_tools

The above picture inspired the creation of the following list of tools needed to build this rover:

POWER TOOLS

Drills* – small Dremmel® drill for sanding and large drill for holes

Saws – table saw for large wood pieces, scroll saw* for round cuts (seen in photo that were replaced with 3D printed part) and acrylic pieces

Electric Sander* – to smooth rough wood saw cuts

HAND TOOLS

Screw Drivers* – extremely small and adjustable for flat and Phillips head screws

Compass* – for drawing circles on wood to cut

Soldering Iron – to solder wires to circuitry

Heat Gun – to heat shrink over solder joints

Tape Measure* – Inches one side, Metrics other side

Fine Files* – to sand 3D printer edges and openings, Husky® offers a great set

Needle Nose Pliers* – to pickup parts and tighten nuts and bolts

Hands-Free Stand with Magnifying Glass* – to hold things and allow two hands to operate on held item

Super Glue* – to lock the switches and nuts inside to Gimbal

Standard Pliers* – to unlock the main axis bolt

Vice Grip Mount* – to hold parts in locked place to solder or test

Magnifying Glasses – to see microscopic wires and solder

Needle Nosed Pliers and Dikes – to manipulate nuts & bolts and cut wires

* Pictured above or below.


Attributions

This section contains items and help with this project. Most have been collected through the years as gifts or purchased for Valencia College classroom exercises. The human-looking mechanical device with magnifying glass is used extensively for seeing microscopic parts and holding pieces to be soldered to add an extra “hand” to allow for other tools to be used.

  1. The Lives of Others – College Critique Leave a reply
  2. Goddard Sentinel Rover Prototype 1 1 Reply
  3. Franks Travel Timeline Leave a reply
  4. US Postal Service Vacant Brains Leave a reply
  5. ObamaCare Leave a reply
  6. 2015 Infraction Factions Leave a reply
  7. Blighthouse Trouble Leave a reply
  8. Vet Scam Butchery Leave a reply
  9. Goddard Recovery Day Leave a reply